CONCH - Communities Opposed to New Coal at Hunterston

> Health Issues



Coal damages the respiratory, cardiovascular, and
nervous systems through pollutants
acting directly
on the body.

Physicians for Social Responsibility


Black Lung -

Coalworker's pneumoconiosis

Coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP), colloquially referred to as Black Lung Disease, is caused by long exposure to coal dust. It is a common affliction of coal miners and others who work with coal. Inhaled coal dust progressively builds up in the lungs and is unable to be removed by the body; that leads to inflammation, fibrosis, and in the worst case, necrosis.

Wikipedia

List of Published Coal Health Studies

Coal Action Scotland

India's generation of children crippled by uranium waste

Their heads are too large or too small, their limbs too short or too bent. For some, their brains never grew, speech never came and their lives are likely to be cut short: these are the children it appears that India would rather the world did not see, the victims of a scandal with potential implications far beyond the country's borders.
It was only when a visiting scientist arranged for tests to be carried out at a German laboratory that the true nature of their plight became clear. The results were unequivocal. The children had massive levels of uranium in their bodies, in one case more than 60 times the maximum safe limit.

An Observer investigation has now uncovered disturbing evidence to suggest a link between the contamination and the region's coal-fired power stations. It is already known that the fine fly ash produced when coal is burned contains concentrated levels of uranium and a new report published by Russia's leading nuclear research institution warns of an increased radiation hazard to people living near coal-fired thermal power stations.

The test results for children born and living in areas around the state's power stations show high levels of uranium in their bodies. Tests on ground water show that levels of uranium around the plants are up to 15 times the World Health Organisation's maximum safe limits. Tests also show that it extends across large parts of the state, which is home to 24 million people.

Observer/Guardian
Most recent additions marked Red Flag Page updated 17th January 2013.

Communities Opposed to New Coal at Hunterston

International Health Issues connected to Coal

The dangers to health posed by coal are not only caused by the burning of coal, but also by its extraction and transport. Coal used by the proposed power station would be bought in from many countries, on the commodities market. Thus what may seem like a purely local issue is actually a major Global Issue.

See also Human Rights, Environment, Coal Mining Accidents and general Links pages.

UK

Douglasdale Coal Health Study (Scotland)

This preliminary report was compiled by Kirstie Stramler, Ph.D. In it, simple analyses performed on publicly available data reveal striking ill-health in people who reside near the Douglas and Dalmellington open-cast coal mines, as compared with aggregated UK health statistics and with a nearby Scottish town upwind from the mines.

Douglasdale

Photo credit: Lindsay Addison

Conclusion: The preliminary analysis of disease incidence and mortality indicates that there are significant differences between the baseline health statistics at Prestwick and those in areas, such as Douglasdale and Dalmellington, in which there are open-cast coal mines.

The discrepancy between the low rate of death from cancer that the inhabitants of the greater Clydesdale area exhibit and the high rate of death from cancer in the Douglasdale sub-region of Clydesdale is particularly troubling, as there is little to differentiate these populations from one another, apart from the coal-mining activities.

Douglasdale Community Coal Health Study (pdf)
Updated version As above, but contains newly updated information and graphics
See also the Coal Health Study Blog

BBC

Coal dust can irritate the sensitive tissues of the lung and lead to the development of several diseases. The Most well known is a condition called pneumoconiosis, which is the name given to a group of lung diseases caused by the inhalation and retention of dust of various sorts. It's also called industrial dust disease. In miners, coal dust is to blame and the condition is also known as black lung disease or anthrosilicosis.

(Emphysema and chronic bronchitis also covered)

Miners' lung disease

The Guardian/Observer Online

One of the world's foremost climate experts launches an excoriating attack on Britain's long love affair with the most polluting fossil fuel of all

Coal-fired power stations are death factories.

UK Department of Energy and Climage Change

DECC administers two major personal injury compensation schemes, which compensate coalminers and their families for health problems caused by working underground in mines operated by British Coal.

The schemes were set up to deal with:

  • respiratory disease (chronic bronchitis and emphysema) resulting from the dusty conditions

  • vibration disease (Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome and Vibration White Finger) caused by using vibrating tools

The schemes are now closed to new claimants.

Background to UK coal health litigation
Connection between coal mining and respiratory disease.
Connection between coal mining and Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome
Linked list of publications dealing with coal health compensaton in the UK

Coal health statistics - Headline statistics as at 19 June 2011

Respiratory Disease

Total Claims 591,768
Live 240,376
Deceased 351,392
Claims settled 591,751
Total Compensation paid £2.37 billion

VWF (vibration white finger)

Total Claims 169,611
Live144,888
Deceased   24,723
Claims settled169,611
Total Compensation paid £1.7 billion
Source :UK Govt statistics

 

AUSTRALIA

Australian Greens

Coal is an organic, combustible sedimentary rock that also contains minerals and inorganic material, within the organic matter. The compressed organic matter laid down in typically saline inland sea basins or swamps millions of years ago, is interspersed with finely weathered rock material, known as shale. The heaviest metals accumulate in the coal and shale strata because their densities and electronic charge mean they tend to concentrate in depositional environments. Coal and coal shales therefore concentrate and accumulate the heaviest of metals, amongst other elements, most of which are bio-toxic and some of which are also radioactive.

Coal is toxic

Blacktown Sun

Past and present employees of Port Waratah Coal Services' Kooragang Island terminal in the Hunter are up to two to three times more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than the NSW and Australian populations, or colleagues based at Carrington in Newcastle, a study has found.

Kooragang coal workers face increased cancer risk: study 20 July, 2012.

Medical Journal of Australia

Summary of study:

  • Australia’s coal conundrum is that all political parties say they are concerned about climate change while sanctioning an unprecedented expansion of coalmining and coal seam gas extraction in Australia.

  • Australia’s coal contributes to climate change and its global health impacts.

  • Each phase of coal’s lifecycle (mining, disposal of contaminated water and tailings, transportation, washing, combustion, and disposing of postcombustion wastes) produces pollutants that affect human health.

  • Communities in which coalmining or burning occurs have been shown to suffer significant health impacts.

  • The health and climate costs of coal are unseen, and when costs to health systems are included, coal is an expensive fuel.

The mining and burning of coal: effects on health and the environment (Sept 2011)

Wide Bay Greens (Australia)

33% of children get asthma 1 mile from an opencast (proved by peakflow measurements etc).
At 2 miles, 21% of children developed asthma and 12% at 3 miles.

According to Hendryx, as coal production increases, so does the incidence of chronic illness. Coal-processing chemicals, equipment powered by diesel engines, explosives, toxic impurities in coals, and even dust from uncovered coal trucks can cause environmental pollution that could have a negative affect on public health.

The data show that people in coal mining communities

  • have a 70%t increased risk for developing kidney disease.

  • have a 64% increased risk for developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) such as emphysema.

  • are 30% more likely to report high blood pressure (hypertension).

Coalmine Health Risks

 

CANADA

Clean Air Alliance

Burning coal produces smog and harms our health. The Ontario Medical Association estimates that air pollution costs Ontario more than $10 billion per year in health care costs, lost work time and other quantifiable expenses, as well as killing an estimated 2,000 Ontarians each year.

Coal Power must go

CHINA

Red FlagBeijing's appalling air pollution exposed by NASA satellites

Satellite images released by NASA reveal the full and appalling extent of the air pollution which afflicting large swathes of north-eastern China.

Pollution over China

Image courtesy of NASA - taken 14th January 2013

Residents of Beijing and many other cities in China were warned to stay inside in mid-January 2013 as the nation faced one of the worst periods of air quality in recent history. The Chinese government ordered factories to scale back emissions, while hospitals saw spikes of more than 20 to 30 percent in patients complaining of respiratory issues, according to news reports.

The image shows extensive haze, low clouds, and fog over the region. The brightest areas tend to be clouds or fog, which have a tinge of gray or yellow from the air pollution. Other cloud-free areas have a pall of gray and brown smog that mostly blots out the cities below

At the time that the January 14 image was taken by satellite, ground-based sensors at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing reported PM2.5 measurements of 291 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Fine, airborne particulate matter (PM) that is smaller than 2.5 microns is considered dangerous because it is small enough to enter the passages of the human lungs. Most PM2.5 aerosol particles come from the burning of fossil fuels and biomass. The World Health Organization considers PM2.5 to be safe when it is below 25.

Also at the time of the image, the air quality index (AQI) in Beijing was 341. An AQI above 300 is considered hazardous to all humans, not just those with heart or lung ailments. AQI below 50 is considered good. On January 12, the peak of the current air crisis, AQI was 775 the U.S Embassy Beijing Air Quality Monitor—off the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency scale—and PM2.5 was 886 micrograms per cubic meter.

Much of China's air pollution is the result of the country's heavy dependence upon coal to power its breakneck economic development. China is currently the world's number one importer of the solid fossil fuel.

NASA 16th January, 2013

Coal drive will not end health risks

A new report (Aug 2010) says huge rates of coal consumption were a factor behind an increase in cancer and birth defects as well as non-specific and chronic nervous, immune and respiratory illnesses.
The report said huge rates of coal consumption were a factor behind an increase in cancer and birth defects as well as non-specific and chronic nervous, immune and respiratory illnesses.

Reuters 29 Aug 2010

Coal Is Linked to Cancer in Yunnan Province

Nonsmoking women in an area of China’s Yunnan province die of lung cancer at a rate 20 times that of their counterparts in other regions of the country — and higher than anywhere else in the world.
A group of scientists now say they have a possible explanation: the burning of coal formed during volcanic eruptions hundreds of millions of years ago.
Coal in that part of China contains high concentrations of silica, a suspected carcinogen, the scientists reported in a recent edition of the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

New York Times (January 2010)

Children and coal don't mix

Children born after the closure of a coal-burning plant in China had 60 percent fewer developmental problems, a study released Monday suggests, giving ammunition to those who argue the country should embrace cleaner sources of energy.
The study in the peer-reviewed Environmental Health Perspectives journal found that after the coal plant was shut in the midwestern city of Tongliang, pregnant mothers living in the area had far less exposure to pollutants and their children showed significantly fewer delays in developing motor skills such as muscle coordination by the age of 2.

MSNBC Source: AP, July 2008

Pneumoconiosis

It is estimated that a total of 57,000 coal miners in China suffer from pneumoconiosis, an occupational lung disease caused by inhalation of dust, each year and more than 6,000 people die due to pneumoconiosis.

57,000 Chinese coal miners suffer from lung disease annually Source: People's Daily, Nov 2010

INDIA

The Guardian/Observer Online

Observer investigation uncovers link between dramatic rise in birth defects in Punjab and pollution from coal-fired power station

India's generation of children crippled by uranium waste

THE NETHERLANDS

KEMA Power generation and Sustainables

Employees of coal-fired power stations and people living enarby, as well as those involved in the shipment and processing of coal fly ash can be exposed to pulverised fuel ash (PVA). an extensive research program was carried out in order to ma such exposure and its effects. Particle size distribution, chemical composition, quartz, radioactivity, emission factors and fugitive dust modelling were studied.

Health aspects of coal fly ash (pdf)

USA

Alaska Community Action on Toxics

In Alaska, coal‐fired power plants generate tens of thousands of metric tons of waste each year, known as coal combustion wastes, of which a major component is coal ash. Coal ash throughout the nation has been found to contain concerning levels of toxic chemicals that pose serious risks to human health. ...

... At the request of local residents concerned about coal ash contamination, a sampling project was conducted in the Fairbanks area in June 2010. This project aimed to determine the composition of coal ash in the Fairbanks region and whether it may be hazardous to health. Samples of coal ash from local power plants, waste disposal sites and reuse sites were found to contain a range of toxic heavy metals. In almost every case, the levels of toxic chemicals were found to be much higher than background soil samples from Fairbanks. In the coal ash samples, levels of arsenic and vanadium were found at concentrations that may harm human health. Two samples from the University of Alaska Fairbanks coal‐fired power plant show arsenic concentrations more than 100 times higher than the standard for residential soils set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Lastly, mercury was found at levels 70 times higher than background soils, and at levels high enough to be a concern if inhaled in the form of windblown dust.

Coal Ash in Alaska: Our Health, Our Right to Know (pdf)

American Journal of Public Health

Abstract of study: Health-Related Quality of Life Among Central Appalachian Residents in Mountaintop Mining Counties

Objectives. We examined the health-related quality of life of residents in mountaintop mining counties of Appalachia using the 2006 national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Methods. Dependent variables included self-rated health; the number of poor physical, poor mental, and activity limitation days (in the past 30 days); and the Healthy Days Index. Independent variables included metropolitan status, primary care physician supply, and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System behavioral and demographic variables. We compared dependent variables across 3 categories: mountaintop mining (yes or no), other coal mining (yes or no), and a referent nonmining group. We used SUDAAN MULTILOG and multiple linear regression models with post hoc least squares means to test mountaintop mining effects after adjusting for covariates.
Results. Residents of mountaintop mining counties reported significantly more days of poor physical, mental, and activity limitation and poorer self-rated health (P < .01) compared with the other county groupings. Results were generally consistent in separate analyses by gender and age.
Conclusions. Mountaintop mining areas are associated with the greatest reductions in health-related quality of life even when compared with counties with other forms of coal mining.

Full report can be downloaded for $20 from AJPH

Chesapeake Bay News

Apparently-cheap electricity from coal-fired power plants is at least twice as expensive as it seems when the costs of illness and death from air pollution are factored in, according to a new Chesapeake Bay Foundation report. These billions of dollars in health-related costs from coal pollution, if accounted for, would make clean energy, from wind and solar power, more economically competitive.

How Coal-Fired Power Plants Drain Health and Wealth

Clean Air Task Force

Among all industrial sources of air pollution, none poses greater risks to human health and the environment than coal-fired power plants. Emissions from coalfired power plants contribute to global warming, ozone smog, acid rain, regional haze, and — perhaps most consequential of all from a public health standpoint — fine particle pollution.

The Toll from Coal (pdf)

Columbia University: Mailman School of Public Health

Closure of Coal-Burning Power Plant in China Directly Linked to Improved Cognitive Development in Children

Study Shows Benefits of Closing Plants on Early Childhood Neurodevelopment

Country Doctor

Should named politicians who pass unsafe applications be forced to compensate?

Dr Dick van Steenis  MB BS

Thirteen years of peer-reviewed research into industrial air pollution (including opencasting) with its consequential health damage of illness and premature deaths.

Coal opencasting and health

Dr Robert Bullard

Coal is cheap.  Coal is also dirty and pollutes when it is mined, transported to the power plant, stored, and burned.  Coal causes smog, soot, acid rain, global warming, and toxic air emissions.The so-called “clean coal” is more myth and PR than reality.  The 2004 Dirty Air, Dirty Power report revealed some shocking health impacts of air pollution from power plants: mortality (23.600), hospital admissions (21,850), emergency room visits for asthma (26,000) heart attacks (38,200), chronic bronchitis (16,200) asthma attacks (554,000), and lost work days (3,186,000).

Health Benefits of Dethroning King Coal

Environmental Defense Fund

In addition to the environmental and human health harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions, coal-fired power plants emit massive amounts of toxic air pollutants that result in significant numbers of deaths and disease.

Estimating the Health Impacts of Coal-Fired Power Plants (pdf)

Environmental Leader

If we needed another reason to be concerned about our heavy reliance on “cheap” coal for energy, we could find all we wanted in a recently released report from a team at the Harvard Medical School. “Full Cost Accounting for the Life Cycle of Coal” catalogues virtually all the ways coal affects society, from fires in abandoned mines that burn for decades to the tourism implications of the environmentally devastating mining practice of “mountaintop removal.”
Harvard’s overall price tag for coal? Up to $500 billion. But what really got our attention was the $140 billion to $242 billion cost the report attached to its public health effects.

Up to $242 Billion in Health Costs of Coal Welcome Statistic but Alarming Toll

The Examiner

Kami Miller's heart flutters irregularly, she needs an inhaler to breathe and she's been diagnosed with thyroid problems. Even more troubling, her 12-year-old son already has the same health woes.
For the Miller family, there is little doubt why they and their fellow tribe members living on the tiny Moapa Band of Paiutes reservation outside Las Vegas are struggling with a litany of medical problems. Steps away from their front doors, a 50-year-old, coal-burning power plant churns out a blanket of white and yellow smoke that hangs over their reservation and obscures the mountain views their people have long admired.

Nevada tribe fights coal plant in pollution battle

Fox News

Recent efforts championed by the coal industry depict environmental policies that demand cleaner coal plants as unnecessarily burdensome to Americans who may have to pay more for electricity. But the multiple billions of dollars of health care costs that are incurred every year due to dirty coal far exceed any cost increases we might see in our electric bills.
Coal mining itself is fundamentally hazardous to health, causing respiratory diseases in miners and polluting the environment around coal mining operations. Soil, water and air are polluted in the process of mining, and millions of tons of toxins are released into the environment. This affects anybody who eats food, breathes air, or drinks water.

why mining-and burning coal could slowly be killing us

Huffington Post

Do the social costs of some coal-fired power plants exceed their values? A new report from the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) suggests that for a number of U.S. coal plants, their social costs as a result of premature deaths exceed the value of the electricity they generate.
In the report, the group examined the coal-fired plants "with the largest emissions of sulfur dioxide in 2010 and 2011 that do not yet have plans to install or upgrade scrubbers" and estimated the number of premature deaths from each plant and the cost of these deaths. The calculations were performed, according to the EIP, "using a peer-reviewed approach consistent with EPA methods."

Environmental Integrity Project Report Examines Coal Plants' Costs

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Access to electricity contributes to good health by powering infrastructure for clean drinking water and sanitation and by reducing the need for indoor burning of coal, wood, and other solid fuels. But these benefits can be offset by health threats posed by the emissions from fossil fuel–based electricity production—direct public health effects attributable to particulate matter, sulfur and nitrous oxides, volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, and ozone are estimated to account for more than 70% of the external costs of power generation (i.e., costs not factored into the price paid for electricity)

Public Health Impact of Coal and Electricity Consumption: Risk–Benefit Balance Varies by Country

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

The main conclusions are:

  • After a long period of declining CWP prevalence, recent surveillance data indicate that the prevalence is rising.

  • Coal miners are developing severe CWP at relatively young ages (<50 years).

  • There is some indication that early development of CWP is being manifested as premature mortality.

  • The above individuals would have been employed all of their working lives in environmental conditions mandated by the 1969 Coal Mine Health and Safety Act.

  • The increase in CWP occurrence appears to be concentrated in hot spots of disease mostly concentrated in the central Appalachian region of southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, and western Virginia.

  • The cause of this resurgence in disease is likely multifactorial. Possible explanations include excessive exposure due to increases in coal mine dust levels and duration of exposure (longer working hours), and increases in crystalline silica exposure (see below). As indicated by data on disease prevalence and severity, workers in smaller mines may be at special risk.

  • Given that the more productive seams of coal are being mined out, a transition by the industry to mining thinner coal seams and those with more rock intrusions is taking place and will likely accelerate in the future. Concomitant with this is the likelihood of increased potential for exposure to crystalline silica, and associated increased risk of silicosis, in coal mining.

Coal Mine Dust Exposures and Associated Health Outcomes (pdf)

National Resources Defense Council

Coal-fired power plants threaten the environment and our health.
Burning coal pollutes the air we breathe and pollutes the water we drink.

Dirty Coal Is Hazardous to Your Health (pdf)

New York Academy of Sciences

Each stage in the life cycle of coal—extraction, transport, processing, and combustion—generates a waste stream and carries multiple hazards for health and the environment. These costs are external to the coal industry and are thus often considered “externalities.” We estimate that the life cycle effects of coal and the waste stream generated are costing the U.S. public a third to over one-half of a trillion dollars annually. Many of these so-called externalities are, moreover, cumulative. Accounting for the damages conservatively doubles to triples the price of electricity from coal per kWh generated, making wind, solar, and other forms of nonfossil fuel power generation, along with investments in efficiency and electricity conservation methods, economically competitive. We focus on Appalachia, though coal is mined in other regions of the United States and is burned throughout the world. February 2011

Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal (purchasable pdf or html full report)

New York Times

Coal is the most important fuel that produces electricity in the United States and around the world. Though reliable and inexpensive, coal is also a major producer of carbon dioxide emissions, and environmentalists say it is critical to reduce dependence on coal in order to stem global warming. ...

The perils of coal extend far beyond global warming. For miners, there is the risk of mine accidents and black lung disease. In addition, coal-burning industries can spew thousands of pollutants into the air, which can cause health problems like respiratory illnesses and possibly developmental disabilities among children."

Coal

National Pubic Radio (USA)

It wasn't supposed to happen to coal miners in Mark McCowan's generation. It wasn't supposed to strike so early and so hard. ... McCowan went from a clean X-ray at age 35 to progressive massive fibrosis — an advanced stage of coal workers' pneumoconiosis, or black lung — in just five years. ...
Incidence of the disease that steals the breath of coal miners doubled in the last decade, according to data analyzed by epidemiologist Scott Laney at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ... Cases of the worst stage of the disease have quadrupled since the 1980s in a triangular region of Appalachia stretching from eastern Kentucky through southern West Virginia and into southwestern Virginia.

As Mine Protections Fail, Black Lung Cases Surge   9th July 2012

Physicians for Social Responsibility (USA)

Coal ash – the waste material left after coal is burned – contains arsenic, mercury, lead, and over a dozen other heavy metals, many of them toxic. And disposal of the growing mounds of coal ash is creating grave risks to human health.
Toxic constituents of coal ash are blowing, spilling and leaching from storage units into air, land and human drinking water, posing an acute risk of cancer and neurological effects as well as many other negative health impacts: heart damage, lung disease, kidney disease, reproductive problems, gastrointestinal illness, birth defects, and impaired bone growth in children.

Coal Ash: Toxic and Leaking

Coal pollutants affect all major body organ systems and contribute to four of the five leading causes of mortality in the US: heart disease, cancer, stroke, and chronic lower respiratory diseases. Each step of the coal lifecycle—mining, transportation, washing, combustion, and disposing of postcombustion wastes—impacts human health. Coal combustion in particular contributes to diseases affecting large portions of the population, including asthma, lung cancer, heart disease, and stroke, compounding the major public health challenges of our time. It interferes with lung development, increases the risk of heart attacks, and compromises intellectual capacity.

Coal's Assault on Human Health (executive summary, pdf)

Coal plants remain the single largest source of sulfur dioxide, mercury and air toxic emissions and the second largest source of nitrogen oxide pollution. Moreover, once emitted, these pollutants combine to form 'secondary pollutants' such as ozone and particulate matter that pose an equally significant threat to public health.

Coal-Fired Power Plants: Understanding the Health Costs of a Dirty Energy Source (pdf)

Public News Service (USA)

A study released in October 2010 takes aim at two coal-fired electricity generation plants in Chicago as the source of dirty air that is resulting in millions being spent on health care and related damage. The Environmental Law and Policy Center says the price tag is about $127 million a year, and could be as high as $1 billion since 2002.

Chicago Coal Plants Costing a Bundle in Healthcare
Full report from the Environmental Law and Policy Center (pdf)
The Public Cost of Pollution from Coal Plants in the Chicago Area

Reproductive Health Reality Check

Deborah Payne, Energy and Health Coordinator of the Kentucky Environmental Foundation calls coal mining “one piece of the birth defect puzzle” and says that at every stage, coal is problematic, from its extraction, to its processing, transport, and eventual burning.  “At each step there are negative health consequences for adults, children, and fetal life,”

Mountaintop Coal Mining Leads to Birth Defects, Respiratory Illness and Other Health Problems

Scientific American

Strange but true: by burning away all the pesky carbon and other impurities, coal power plants produce heaps of radiation

Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste

Sierra Club

Carbon pollution is the main contributor to climate disruption and is linked to life-threatening air pollution like the smog that causes asthma attacks, making it a serious threat to Americans’ health and future. ... Yet even though doctors and scientists confirm that carbon pollution poses serious threats to Americans’ health, our economy, and our children’s future, there are currently no federal limits on the amount of carbon being spewed into the air by the nation’s largest sources of carbon pollution – dirty coal-fired power plants.

Carbon pollution: An Urgent Threat from Coal

In the United States, there is a 50 percent chance that your air is not safe to breathe — thanks to dangerous levels of air pollution like smog and soot.
Smog is not just an eyesore. It irritates our lungs, triggers asthma attacks, increases emergency room visits, and can lead to irreversible lung damage or even death.
Soot pollution, meanwhile, causes an estimated 9,700 hospitalizations and more than 20,000 heart attacks each year. Dangerous soot pollution is linked to irregular heartbeat, chronic bronchitis, decreased lung function, and irritation of the airways.

Coal Plant Pollution Triggers Asthma Attacks and Makes Kids Sick

In Appalachia, mining companies blow the tops off mountains to reach a thin seam of coal. They then dump millions of tons of rubble and toxic waste into the streams and valleys below the mining sites.
This destructive practice, known as mountaintop-removal mining, has damaged or destroyed nearly 2,000 miles of streams and threatens to destroy 1.4 million acres of mountaintops and forests by 2020. The mining poisons drinking water, destroys beautiful forests and wildlife habitat, increases the risk of flooding and wipes out entire communities.
Mountaintop removal pollutes waterways and allows toxic heavy metals such as cadmium, selenium, and arsenic to leach into local water supplies — the same water that Appalachia's people rely on. But the danger isn't limited to drinking water: mountaintop removal also causes air pollution that affects communities for miles around. Many of the toxins that pollute mountaintop-removal sites are carcinogens, and cancer rates are twice as high for people who live near mountaintop-removal sites.

Mountaintop Removal Mining

In addition to health hazards caused by mining and burning coal, disposing of coal waste puts communities at risk as well. Every year, the nation’s coal plants produce 140 million tons of coal ash, the toxic waste that is left over after the coal is burned. All that ash has to go somewhere—so it’s dumped in thousands of open-air pits across the nation. At these waste sites, chemicals like arsenic, lead and selenium, can leak into the groundwater.
Living near a wet coal ash storage pond is significantly more dangerous than smoking a pack of cigarettes a day, according to a risk assessment done by EPA.
The toxins found in coal ash have been linked to organ disease, cancer, respiratory illness, neurological damage and developmental problems. People living with 1 mile of unlined coal ash ponds can have a 1 in 50 risk of cancer —that's more than 2,000 times higher than what EPA considers acceptable.
Exposure to toxic coal ash can lower birth rates, cause tissue disease, slow development and even kill plants and animals, leading to changes in wildlife concentrations and disruptions in entire ecosystems. The toxic pollution from coal ash builds up in exposed animals and plants, causing the pollution to make its way up the food chain when they are eaten. Children are more susceptible to the health impacts of coal ash—and, according to the EPA, 1.54 million children live near coal ash storage sites.

Coal Ash

Union of Concerned Scientists

Environmental impact of coal power

Air pollution
Wastes generated

West Virginia Gazette

Research study by Dr Michael Hendryx, of the Department of Community Medicine, Institute for Health Policy Research, West Virginia University, and Dr Melissa M. Ahern, of the Department of Pharmacotherapy, Washington State University, Spokane, WA

Objectives: We examined elevated mortality rates in Appalachian coal mining areas for 1979–2005, and estimated the corresponding value of statistical life (VSL) lost relative to the economic benefits of the coal mining industry.

Conclusions: Research priorities to reduce Appalachian health disparities should focus on reducing disparities in the coalfields. The human cost of the Appalachian coal mining economy outweighs its economic benefits.

Mortality in Appalachian Coal Mining Regions (pdf)

West Virginia University: Department of Community Medicine

...Results demonstrate that lung cancer mortality for the years 2000-2004 is higher in areas of heavy Appalachian coal mining after adjustments for smoking, poverty, education, age, sex, race and other covariates. Higher mortality may be the result of exposure to environmental contaminates associated with the coal mining industry, although smoking and poverty are also contributing factors. The knowledge of the geographic areas within Appalachia where lung cancer mortality is higher can be used to target programmatic and policy interventions. The set of socioeconomic and health inequalities characteristic of coal mining areas of Appalachia highlights the need to develop more diverse, alternative local economies.

Lung Cancer Mortality Is Elevated in Coal Mining Areas of Appalachia (pdf)

 


Al Gore - "Clean Coal is like healthy cigarettes"

Read CONCH's objection letter (link to pdf)

Coalfinger - Greenpeace spoof video

A new report by Physicians for Social Responsibility and Earthjustice finds that exposure to coal ash, the byproduct of coal-fired power, can cause cancer, lung disease, kidney disease, mental retardation and respiratory problems.
The report also finds that pollutants from coal ash can leak into drinking water.
Here's a rundown of the report's findings, from a summary provided by the groups:

* The toxic metals arsenic, lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium and selenium contained in coal ash contribute to several forms of cancer, as well as lung disease, kidney disease, mental retardation, breathing problems and even death.
* The report documents the analysis of 73 samples of coal ash waste that showed that pollutants including arsenic and selenium can leach into drinking water at levels exceeding those which the federal government defines as hazardous, sometimes by orders of magnitude.
* Coal ash spills, leaks and leaches into surface and ground water, are absorbed by fish and other animals, and can even be delivered by the air people breathe.
* Low-income communities often carry a disproportionate burden of living near coal ash facilities.


"Coal helped to power America’s industrial revolution, and electricity is obviously vital to our economy today. But we have better choices now than we had more than forty years ago, when most of these plants were built. Investments in advanced emission controls can greatly reduce the dangerous buildup of fine particles, and investments in renewable energy and efficiency improvements can secure our supply of electricity – and generate the jobs we need – without the death and disease that are the price we pay for dirty coal plants."

Huffington Post